Runtime control for AI systems that act

Control AI actions before they reach your tools, files, code, and systems.

JintellarCore sits in the execution path for AI workflows, applying policy, routing, approval, and evidence capture before work continues.

Runtime operations console

A control surface for workflow runs, approvals, routing posture, evidence, and operational state.

Control layer

Core runtime loop

Policy before execution. Proof after execution.

The runtime gives AI workflows a controlled path from request to action to review, so teams can move beyond chat without losing control of what the system is allowed to do.

1

Classify request and context

2

Check policy and permissions

3

Route model or tool access

4

Require approval or block when needed

5

Execute within allowed boundaries

6

Preserve evidence and replay history

Runtime capabilities

Control the paths where AI work becomes real action.

JintellarCore focuses on the points where regulated teams need confidence: routing, permissions, approvals, execution boundaries, evidence, and deployment fit.

Data and model routing

Route work by sensitivity, model policy, deployment boundary, and allowed provider path.

Tool and action control

Constrain tool, API, file, code, and workspace actions before the workflow proceeds.

Human approval gates

Require reviewer approval for sensitive, high-impact, or policy-controlled steps.

Workspace and code boundaries

Run technical work inside approved workspaces with clear command and artifact limits.

Evidence and replay

Attach decisions, approvals, outputs, and artifacts to the same workflow record.

Deployment flexibility

Support workflow packages, private environments, and integration paths around existing systems.

AI Turn Case File

A case file for every governed AI run.

Each run connects prompts, retrieved context, model routes, tool calls, approvals, outputs, artifacts, and policy decisions into one reconstructable record.

Prompts and retrieved context
Model routes and tool calls
Approvals and policy decisions
Outputs, artifacts, and review history

Evidence case file

Review the connected record of prompts, context, routes, tool calls, approvals, outputs, artifacts, and decisions.

Deployment modes

Adopt the control layer at the level the workflow needs.

Teams can begin with one packaged workflow, integrate the runtime into existing AI execution paths, or deploy privately for sensitive environments.

Workflow package

Start with one repeatable business process, the required controls, and the evidence reviewers need.

Runtime integration

Place the control layer in the execution path for AI workflows that already touch tools or systems.

Self-hosted / private environment

Run sensitive workflows where your security, data, and deployment requirements are strongest.

Sidecar/tool-control mode

Where full proxying is not practical, govern specific tools, actions, workspaces, or workflow steps.

Differentiation

Built for AI actions, not just AI prompts.

Prompt logging is not enough once AI is allowed to retrieve, call, edit, run, approve, or publish. The control path has to sit before action, then keep proof connected to the workflow.

Enforcement happens before execution, not only after logging.
Tool and workspace actions are governed as first-class events.
Evidence is attached to the workflow, not scattered across logs.
Sensitive work can be routed through local or private paths.
Workflows remain reviewable, approvable, retryable, and replayable.

Give AI a controlled path to act.

Start with the workflows where action, approval, and evidence matter most, then expand the control layer across teams and systems.